Based on the awareness as Indonesia citizen in building a nation civilization that is based on noble character, some anti-money laundering practitioners are motivated to participate in the development of anti-money laundering regime in Indonesia. This is intended to enhance law enforcement efforts and to maintain the stability of financial system.

Various steps that have been performed by the Government always been supported with synergizing through several constructive activities. The mentioned activities directed to facilitate the effectiveness of assignment for Indonesia Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) that is responsible for the prevention and eradication crime of money laundering. Also, it is intended to become a direct partner of implementing agency in term of the development of anti-money laundering regime such as: Financial Service Provider and Goods Provider and or other Disignated Non-Financial Business Provider (DNFBP); Central Bank (Bank Indonesia), Bapepam-Financial Institution and other Supervisory and Regulatory Institution; Directorate General of Custom and Excise; National Police, Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Attorney General, and Directorate General of Tax as investigator; Attorney and KPK as public prosecutor; and judiciary.

Given the vast scope and the number of institutional elements involved, the roles of this established institution is expected to be able to connect various stakeholders for the effectiveness of anti-money laundering regime. In addition, this institution is expected to be able to encourage public awareness to assist in the establishment of anti-money laundering regime through aspirational activities particularly with advocacy services or continuous consultation.

Several things are expected for these aims and objectives, such as:

1. Differences in level of understanding and implementation of anti-money laundering, starting from Reporting Parties, Supervisory and Regulatory Institution and Law Enforcement Personnel along with the minimalization of other interested parties gradually.
2. Development of competent and professional human resources particularly Financial Service Provider and other Reporting Parties.
3. The availability of an integrative and applicable anti-money laundering operational policy and prevention financing of terrorism.
4. The existence of public service and law enforcement personnel through advocacy and consultation within the scope of anti-money laundering application
5. Review or assessment all related aspects of implementation of Money Laundering Criminal Act Law (UU TPPU).
6. The availability of media publication for sustainable community
7. Establishment of effective coordination between the stakeholders and public in general
8. The effectiveness of social control in the implementation of anti-money laundering.

All the supporting parties expect that this idea is not only ending on the level of discourse but more on the realization in term of planned and measured program activities.